Block: Cash App Owner Agrees in Principle to a $964M Justice Department Deal
Block, the company behind Cash App, says it agreed in principle to pay the Justice Department about $964M over money-laundering controls. It is not final.

Key numbers
About $964M
Gross amount
About $764M
Net payment
3 years
Charge deferred for
Not final
Status
On 3 November 2026, in a quarterly report filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Block, Inc. told investors that it had reached an agreement in principle with the US Department of Justice (DOJ). Block is the payments company behind Cash App, the phone app that people use to send money to friends, spend on a debit card, buy shares and buy bitcoin. The agreement, if it is finalised, would see the company pay roughly $964 million in total, or about $764 million after credit for earlier settlements, and would put off a criminal charge for three years.
Two things matter as much as the numbers. No court has found that Block did anything wrong. And the agreement is not signed: the filing says it "remains subject to reaching a final agreement satisfactory to all parties and court approval."
What Block disclosed
The disclosure sits in Note 16 of Block's 10-Q, the quarterly report that listed US companies file with the SEC. It says that in October 2026 Block and the DOJ "reached an agreement in principle to resolve the matter pursuant to a deferred prosecution agreement." Under it, the DOJ "will defer, for a period of three years, a charge that the Company failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act."
Two terms need translating. An anti-money-laundering programme is the set of checks a financial firm must run to stop criminals using it to move dirty money: confirming who customers are, watching transactions for suspicious patterns and reporting them to the government. The Bank Secrecy Act, passed in 1970, is the US law that requires those checks. A deferred prosecution agreement is a deal in which prosecutors hold a charge in reserve instead of pursuing it. The company pays, promises to follow a list of obligations, and if it keeps them for the agreed term, prosecutors drop the charge for good. If it breaks them, the charge can be brought. It is closer to probation for a company than to a trial.
The filing puts numbers on it. The agreement is expected to carry "a gross monetary component of approximately $964 million" and "a net monetary payment of approximately $764 million based on credit for prior regulatory resolutions." The $200 million gap is credit for earlier regulatory settlements. The filing does not list which settlements count towards it. Block says it had set aside $764 million for the matter by 30 September 2026.
What it is not: the filing does not describe a guilty plea, and the $964 million is not a fine imposed by a judge. It is a figure in a deal that has not been signed. The filing also does not say that a charge has been filed in court.
Where the crypto link is
Cash App lets customers buy and sell bitcoin, and Block's filing describes this as a feature of the app. Bitcoin is a meaningful part of its income: Block reported that bitcoin ecosystem gross profit fell 50% in the third quarter of 2026, to $52 million from $104 million a year earlier, mainly because it cut fees on some bitcoin transactions, according to the crypto news site CoinDesk.
That is the whole of the crypto link as far as the record shows. The filing does not say the DOJ's charge is about bitcoin or any other digital coin. It describes a failure to keep an effective money-laundering programme at the company, which has businesses well beyond crypto, including Square, which supplies card readers and payment software to shops. Cash App is covered here because it is a mainstream route into bitcoin for ordinary people, and because the case shows how the US treats the compliance of firms that sit between customers and crypto.
How it began: a short seller's report
The inquiry traces back to 23 March 2023, when the investment firm Hindenburg Research published a report on Cash App. Hindenburg was a short seller, a firm that bets a company's share price will fall and profits if it does. It alleged that Cash App inflated its user numbers by counting duplicate and fraudulent accounts, and that weak identity checks let criminals use the app for scams, money laundering and other illicit payments. Those were Hindenburg's allegations, not findings by any regulator or court.
Block responded the same day. Its press release said it intended "to work with the SEC and explore legal action against Hindenburg Research for the factually inaccurate and misleading report," and that the report was "designed to deceive and confuse investors." It added that it was "confident in our products, reporting, compliance programs, and controls." CoinDesk reports that Block rejected the findings as inaccurate and misleading. The 10-Q says the SEC and the DOJ both made inquiries shortly after the report, and that they "primarily relate to the allegations raised in the short seller report, the Company's compliance and risk practices, and related disclosures."
The SEC side ended without action. In March 2026 the SEC staff told Block it had finished its investigation and did not intend to recommend an enforcement action. In the same month the DOJ gave Block its proposed terms. Block disputed them at first. In May 2026 it disclosed a $240 million reserve and said, as reported by Payments Dive, that it disputed "the basis and methodology underlying the DOJ's assessment of the matter." The amount set aside is now $764 million.
The earlier regulator cases
The credit for earlier settlements points to a record of regulator action against Cash App. In April 2025 the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) fined Block $40 million, citing serious gaps in its compliance systems. CoinDesk reports that a backlog of suspicious-transaction alerts waiting for review grew from about 18,000 in 2018 to more than 169,000 by 2020, and that one screening system did not automatically block bitcoin transfers to wallets linked to terrorism financing until their exposure passed 10%. Payments Dive reports that in the previous year Block also paid $255 million to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and 48 states over weak security protocols. In July 2026, according to the 10-Q, Block settled with state attorneys general over how Cash App handled customer complaints and disputes, for what it called an immaterial amount.
Block's position
No separate Block statement on the agreement turned up beyond the filing. The filing says Block "cannot provide any assurance that a final agreement will be reached on the terms described above or at all," and that the DOJ could take legal action if no deal is finalised. It also warns that final terms could cost more than the amount set aside. Jack Dorsey, Block's co-founder, is not named in the filing's account of the matter, and nothing made public shows the DOJ accusing him of anything. The company, not any individual, is the party in the agreement.
The filing does not say whether Block accepts the DOJ's charge. A deferred prosecution agreement normally includes a statement of facts that the company accepts, and no such document has been published for this one.
Other cases alongside it
The same note records a shareholder class action, filed in January 2025, alleging that Block made false or misleading statements about its money-laundering controls. A judge refused to dismiss it in January 2026. Block says a loss beyond what it has accrued is reasonably possible. Separately, in October 2026 Block and the defendants in a set of shareholder derivative lawsuits, which are claims made on the company's behalf against its directors and officers, agreed in principle to a settlement under which insurers would pay Block $150 million.
The aftermath
Nothing is final. The next steps are a signed deferred prosecution agreement and court approval, and neither exists yet. The filing says that if Block fully complies with the agreement's obligations for three years, the DOJ will move to dismiss the deferred charge with prejudice, which means for good. If the DOJ decides during that term that Block broke its obligations, the company could be prosecuted on the deferred charge.
The money is already in Block's books: it has accrued $764 million, and the company says the final cost could be higher. Block reported third-quarter net income of about $566 million, which CoinDesk notes is smaller than the proposed payment.
What this teaches
- An agreement in principle is not a signed deal. The terms can change, and the filing itself says it might not be finalised.
- A deferred prosecution agreement is not a conviction or a guilty plea. It is a charge held back while the company shows it can meet conditions.
- A short seller's claims are claims. Here they led to inquiries; the SEC closed its side with no action, while the DOJ side ended in a proposed deal.
- Money-laundering controls are a legal duty for any firm that moves customers' money, whether or not crypto is involved.
- Credit for earlier settlements can cut a headline figure, so the gross and net numbers have to be read together.