DEBT Box: The SEC Is Back With a $200M Fraud Case, Before the Judge Who Sanctioned It
The SEC says DEBT Box sold $200M of crypto licences tied to oil wells that never paid. Its first case collapsed; this one goes to the same judge.

Key numbers
Over $200M
Licences sold (SEC says)
About $161M
Received from investors (SEC says)
About $101M
Spent buying its own tokens (SEC says)
$1,821,824
SEC's 2024 sanctions bill
On 12 November 2021 an oil company drilling a well in White Pine County, Nevada, sent DEBT Box's founders a short email. "Before we could complete the drilling, the BLM issued a shutdown order yesterday," it read. The BLM is the Bureau of Land Management, which controls drilling on federal land. The well had produced no oil.
Five months later, on 25 April 2022, DEBT Box emailed its investors a "BURN NOTICE". Revenue from "oil well projects", it said, had been used to buy 3.348 billion of its Black Gold (BGLD) tokens and destroy them, a burn it valued at $34,770,998.08. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) says DEBT Box never received any oil revenue at all, and the tokens were bought with investors' own money.
That is the core of a lawsuit the SEC filed on 28 October 2026 in the US District Court for the District of Utah, in Salt Lake City: SEC v. Jason R. Anderson et al., No. 2:26-cv-01066. A heading in the 92-page complaint gives the scale: DEBT Box "Received Over $161 Million from Investors through the Sale of Over $200 Million Worth of Securities". More than 100,000 investors bought in between November 2021 and August 2023, the SEC says, and promoters kept the difference as commissions. These are allegations. No court has ruled on them.
It is the SEC's second attempt. The first collapsed in 2024, after Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby found the agency had acted in bad faith, ordered it to pay $1.82 million in fees and costs, and ordered that any new case be brought before him. The new complaint was filed in his court.
What investors bought
DEBT Box, short for "Decentralized Eco-Friendly Blockchain Technology", was a joint venture. Blox Lending LLC, owned by Jason R. Anderson of St. George, Utah, ran the websites, app, wallets and tokens. Digital Licensing Inc (DLI), owned by Schad Brannon and Roydon Nelson, sold the product and ran the "physical side".
The product was a licence costing from a few hundred to several thousand dollars, each tied to one real-world business: BGLD to oil, NATG to natural gas, ALUM to aluminium, GROW to cannabis, DLG to gold, and others to drinks, water and property. A licence earned a daily drip of that project's token, a digital coin on BNB Chain, a blockchain launched by the exchange Binance. DEBT Box called them "software mining licenses", but the SEC says nobody mined anything: the tokens were made by code, and buyers did no work for them.
The profit was to come from the "buy and burn". Royalties from the wells and farms would buy tokens on the market and destroy them, the way a company uses profits to buy back and cancel its shares, leaving each holder a bigger slice. "No Fake Meme Coins Here. Real projects tied to real assets," the marketing read. At a Salt Lake City investor conference in January 2023, Anderson said DEBT Box had "created roughly 10,000 new millionaires in the United States." On a podcast that month a promoter said he was collecting rewards for Nelson's work, and Nelson replied: "For other people's efforts. It's amazing." Profit from others' efforts is part of the legal test for a security.
Where the SEC says the money went
The royalties never arrived, the SEC says. Less than $15 million of the $200 million reached real businesses, it says, and most of those had no duty to pay DEBT Box anything. A second oil well, in Nebraska, stopped in August 2022 when, in Brannon's words in an email, the "drill bit has broken off in the hole".
The complaint accounts for the $161 million it says DEBT Box received in four parts. About $101 million was used by Anderson and Blox to buy DEBT Box's own tokens; about $79 million of those were burned, and the other $22 million went mostly into the trading pools investors used to cash out. About $37 million was paid to Anderson, Blox, or Business Funding Solutions LLC, another Anderson company. About $14 million ended up with DLI, Brannon or Nelson. About $9 million was returned to a promoter or used for other purposes.
Cashing out ran through one route. Investors swapped project tokens for DEBT Box's own DEBT token, then swapped DEBT for USDC, a stablecoin (a digital dollar), on PancakeSwap, a trading venue that works like a vending machine stocked with two coins. Anderson and Blox stocked those machines, providing over 99% of the money in the pools that paid out in outside currency, the SEC says. In effect, the SEC says, early investors were paid with later investors' money, which "had the purpose and effect of Ponzi payments."
By June 2023, according to WhatsApp messages quoted in the complaint, Anderson was telling his partners that "token support" cost about $200,000 a day while licence sales brought in about $3.5 million a month. "We are spending EVERY cent to support the beast because no $ coming in," he wrote.
How the first case fell apart
The SEC first sued on 26 July 2023, under seal, naming 18 defendants and alleging about $49 million in fraud. It asked for an ex parte temporary restraining order (TRO): an emergency order granted after hearing only one side. With it came an asset freeze and a receiver, the equivalent of a court locking a company's bank accounts and putting a caretaker in charge before the owners can object. Because the other side cannot answer, the agency asking must be scrupulously accurate.
At the hearing on 28 July 2023 the judge was inclined to refuse. The SEC's lawyer then told him that in "the last 48 hours" the defendants had closed "around 33 bank accounts", and that they meant to move money abroad, citing a DEBT Box video about Abu Dhabi. Shelby treated this as the most significant evidence and granted the order. The court later found no bank account had closed in those 48 hours. Shelby dissolved the order on 6 October 2023, and the SEC admitted errors in December.
On 18 March 2024, in an 80-page ruling, Shelby found the SEC had advanced its evidence "in deliberately false and misleading ways" and called its conduct "a gross abuse of the power entrusted to it by Congress." He wrote that "companies were seized, assets were frozen, and lives were upended." The sanction: the SEC must pay all costs caused by the emergency order. On 28 May 2024 he set the bill at $1,821,824.11, made up of $1,074,882.25 to defence lawyers and $746,941.86 to the receiver, and granted the SEC's request to drop the case, on one condition: any refiling "must be filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah before the undersigned." That is why the sanctions matter now: the judge hearing the new case has already found, in writing, that the same agency misled him about the same company.
What each side says
The new case is narrower: five defendants instead of 18, brought by a new team from the SEC's Denver Regional Office. It charges Anderson and Blox with fraud under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and asks for a permanent ban on Anderson selling securities, repayment with interest, penalties and a jury trial. Business Funding Solutions is a relief defendant: said to have received at least $15,197,761 of investor money, but not accused of wrongdoing.
Brannon, Nelson and DLI face only charges that require negligence, not intent, and have settled without admitting the allegations. Subject to the court's approval, Brannon and Nelson accept two-year bans from selling securities and $118,225 penalties each, plus repayments of $100,025 (Nelson) and $85,000 (Brannon) with interest. DLI would pay a $591,127 penalty.
No response from Anderson or Blox Lending to the new complaint had been reported by 31 October 2026. When the first case was dismissed in 2024, Richard Hong of Morrison Cohen, lead counsel for the DEBT Box defendants, Anderson among them, told The Salt Lake Tribune: "My clients are relieved that it's over, for now. But if the SEC brings further action, we will be ready for it." DEBT Box called the ruling a "monumental victory" on X and noted that any future SEC action "would have to go through Judge Shelby." It now has.
The aftermath
As of 31 October 2026 the case has just been filed, No. 2:26-cv-01066 in the US District Court for the District of Utah, under the condition Judge Robert J. Shelby set in 2024 that any refiling come before him. The settlements with Digital Licensing, Schad Brannon and Roydon Nelson are proposed final judgments and take effect only if the court approves them. Together they would bring in about $1.04 million in repayments, interest and penalties, a small fraction of the roughly $161 million the SEC says investors paid in.
The allegations against Jason R. Anderson and Blox Lending have not been proven, and no answer from them has been reported. It is a civil case: it can end in bans, repayment orders and fines, but not prison, and no criminal charges have been announced. No fund for DEBT Box investors has been set up. When the first case ended in 2024, The Salt Lake Tribune reported that DEBT Box, once based in Draper, Utah, was running limited operations overseas.
The $1,821,824.11 the SEC was ordered to pay in 2024 fell on taxpayers, as The Salt Lake Tribune pointed out at the time. The question the new case will test is whether the agency can prove a larger fraud, with a new team, in front of the judge who found its first team had misled him.
What this teaches
- A token buyback only means something if real profit pays for it. The SEC says DEBT Box's buybacks were paid with new investors' money.
- A pitch tied to oil wells, farms or gold is not the same as revenue from them. The SEC says no royalty ever reached DEBT Box.
- When the same insiders supply nearly all the money in the pool investors cash out from, the price on the screen is whatever they keep it at.
- An emergency order granted after hearing one side is only as good as what that side says. In 2024 a judge made the SEC pay $1.82M for what it said.
- A case dismissed without prejudice can come back. This one did, two years and five months later.