Advertisement

Watch four AI agents manage money in public.

Subscription opening soon. Not financial advice.

Rug Pull Museum

$LIBRA: Milei's Post, a $4.5B Peak and $251M in Trader Losses

Argentina's president shared a token on X. It hit $4.5 billion in 43 minutes, then fell 94%. Nineteen months on, the court cases are still open.

$LIBRA: Milei's Post, a $4.5B Peak and $251M in Trader LossesPhoto: social media. Token logo: CoinGecko
Hayden Davis, right, with Javier Milei. Inset: the $LIBRA token.

Key numbers

  • $251M

    Lost by traders

  • $107M

    Drained from pools

  • $4.5B

    Peak market value

  • 43 min

    Time to peak

At 7:01 on the evening of Friday 14 February 2025, Javier Milei, the president of Argentina, posted a message to his 3.8 million followers on X. "Liberal Argentina is growing," it began. A "private project" called Viva la Libertad would "encourage the growth of the Argentine economy by funding small Argentine businesses and startups. The world wants to invest in Argentina." Below it were a link and a 44-character code: the address of a brand new digital token called $LIBRA.

Forty-three minutes later the token was trading at $4.55, and the market valued the whole supply at about $4.5 billion, according to the blockchain analytics firm Nansen. Within a few hours it had fallen by roughly 94%. Milei deleted the post. Nansen later calculated that 86% of the traders it tracked had lost money, a combined $251 million, while a smaller group made $180 million.

What was being sold

Advertisement

Powered by Cyntri AI

The technology behind this newsroom. Built by Cyntri AI.

AI-assisted publishing, content pipelines and analytics. Crypto Media Zone is our working example.

Powered by Cyntri AI

$LIBRA was a memecoin: a token with no company, profits or assets behind it, whose price depends only on how many people want it. Launching one is closer to printing raffle tickets than to listing a share. There is no prospectus and no regulator checking the paperwork. Anyone can create a billion tokens in minutes.

For people to buy, a token needs a trading pool, known in crypto as "liquidity". Think of it as the float of shares and cash a market maker holds so that buyers and sellers can trade instantly. The issuer puts tokens in; buyers put in dollars, here USDC (a digital dollar) and SOL (the currency of the Solana network the token ran on). Whoever supplied the pool can, in most set-ups, withdraw what is in it, including the cash buyers have paid in.

$LIBRA was created at 6:38 that evening, Buenos Aires time, according to Nansen and a later report by Argentina's Federal Police. Its pools sat on Meteora, a Solana trading platform. The Federal Police report found that a single wallet belonging to the team of Hayden Davis, an American who ran a firm called Kelsier Ventures, held primary control over all one billion tokens. The token was listed on no exchange, the crypto equivalent of a broker, when Milei posted the address. The first one, the Argentine exchange Ripio, added it at 9:40 that night.

Where the money went

A blockchain is a public ledger, so every transfer can be followed, and the firms that do this for a living arrived at similar numbers. Chainalysis found, as Reuters reported, that eight wallets which had received tokens directly from the creator withdrew about $99 million in USDC and SOL from the pools. The tracking account Lookonchain put the figure at $107 million, and Bubblemaps said about 82% of the supply sat in a tight, unlocked cluster that could be sold at any time. Bubblemaps described the method: the insiders added pools containing only $LIBRA while removing the USDC and SOL that buyers had deposited. In stock market terms, the market maker kept taking the cash out of the order book and leaving only more shares behind.

Bar chart: $251M lost by 86% of traders, $180M made by the rest, $107M and $99M pulled out by insiders, $57.6M released by a US judgeCMZ chart. Data: Nansen, Lookonchain, Chainalysis, US court
Who lost and who gained, by the analysts' counts.

Davis did not dispute that he controlled the money. In a video interview with the YouTube investigator Coffeezilla on 17 February he called himself the launch adviser, said about $100 million sat "in an account that I'm the custodian of", and said: "It's not a rug. It's a plan gone miserably wrong." A "rug pull" is crypto slang for promoters draining a project and leaving buyers with worthless tokens. On X he wrote that he had not taken, and would not take, any of the funds for his personal benefit. He also told Coffeezilla his team had "sniped", or bought the instant trading opened, both $LIBRA and the MELANIA memecoin launched a month earlier, according to CoinDesk. He said Milei's side had asked him to delay putting money back into the pool while they waited for a second presidential video that never came.

Hayden Davis, the American adviser behind the $LIBRA launchPhoto: social media
Hayden Davis, whose company Kelsier Ventures launched the token.

What Milei said

Within hours Milei deleted the post and wrote a new one. "I did not know the details of the project and after learning about it, I decided not to continue spreading it," he wrote, in Reuters' translation, adding that he had no connection with the company. On 17 February he told the TN channel: "I didn't promote it, I spread it." He said he had acted in good faith and taken no money, and he compared the losses to a casino: "If you go to a casino and lose money, what's the complaint? It's a problem between private parties." He disputed reports of 44,000 buyers, putting the number at about 5,000 at most, with "very remote chances" that many were Argentine.

A statement from the Office of the President attributed Viva la Libertad to KIP Protocol, a company run by the Singaporean entrepreneur Julian Peh, whose representatives it said had met Milei on 19 October 2024, with Davis to supply the technology. Peh said "nobody has profited from this", and KIP denied that the project was discussed at that meeting. Ben Chow, co-founder and chief executive of Meteora, resigned within days. Meteora denied any insider trading and hired the law firm Fenwick & West to review the launch.

The trail since

Milei and Davis had met before. Davis came to Buenos Aires in October 2024 for a Tech Forum organised by Mauricio Novelli, a trader who had known Milei since at least 2021, and met the president at the Casa Rosada on 30 January 2025. In March 2026, forensic experts from Datip, the prosecution service's technology unit, recovered from Novelli's seized phone several drafts of a "confidential agreement" under which Davis would advise the Argentine government on blockchain, unpaid, around the date of that meeting, La Nación and Protos reported. No signed copy has been found. La Nación reported that on the day of the meeting Davis sent two transfers of $499,999 each; Protos reported that about $1 million in USDC travelled from Davis-linked wallets through a retiree's wallet to Novelli's.

The same phone showed eight contacts between Novelli and Milei on 14 February 2025, at 6:44, 6:54, 6:56, 6:58, 7:03, 7:32, 10:00 and 10:05 in the evening, according to Infobae; The New York Times reported the call logs in April 2026. What was said is not known. Milei has denied any agreement with Davis. The General Secretariat of the Presidency, run by his sister Karina Milei, told the prosecutor it had "no records, entries or documentation" of one.

None of this has been tested in court. Nobody has been convicted, and as of September 2026 no one has been formally questioned as a suspect in Argentina. Milei has not been charged.

The aftermath

The Argentine criminal case, led by federal prosecutor Eduardo Taiano and now before federal judge Marcelo Martínez De Giorgi, investigates possible fraud around the launch. In November 2025 the judge froze assets belonging to Davis, Novelli, members of Novelli's family and others, and in January 2026 the federal appeals chamber raised the amounts. Complainants have asked the court to summon Milei for formal questioning; it has not done so. On 3 July 2026 the judge removed five investors from the case as private complainants at the request of Novelli's defence, and on 4 September 2026 judges Mariano Llorens and Pablo Bertuzzi of the Federal Chamber confirmed the ruling, finding the investors had not shown a specific false statement that led them to buy, as opposed to losses on a risky asset they chose to hold. The investors filed appeals to the Federal Court of Cassation in mid-September. That leaves the prosecutor as the only party driving the case.

The government's own inquiries ended early. A presidential investigation unit created on 19 February 2025 was dissolved by decree in May 2025. The Anti-Corruption Office ruled on 5 June 2025 that Milei had posted from his personal account, without public resources, and broke no ethics law. A congressional commission chaired by Maximiliano Ferraro disagreed: its November 2025 report said the facts were consistent with fraud, attributed direct responsibility to the president and recommended Congress consider whether he had failed in his duties. Members of Milei's party and the PRO disputed it. A June 2026 Federal Police technical report said the token was not publicly listed when Milei posted it, which cut against his description of it as something already public.

In New York, Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures (case 1:25-cv-03891) accuses Kelsier, Hayden Davis, his brother Gideon Davis, his father Charles Thomas Davis, Meteora and Ben Chow of fraud and racketeering over $LIBRA and an earlier token, M3M3, and seeks more than $100 million. Milei is not a defendant. Judge Jennifer Rochon froze $57.6 million in USDC, then lifted the freeze in August 2025, saying the defendants were not acting as "evasive actors" and that she was sceptical the plaintiffs would succeed. In a sworn declaration in June 2025 Davis denied fraud and insider trading, disputed New York's jurisdiction, and said Milei's post drove the price up and its deletion drove it down. The case was still open in September 2026. Davis had not publicly responded to the reports of the draft agreement.

What this teaches

  • A token address posted by a head of state is not an endorsement anyone has checked. $LIBRA was 23 minutes old and listed on no exchange when it was shared.
  • Whoever supplies a memecoin's trading pool can usually withdraw the buyers' cash from it. Analysts traced about $99 million to $107 million taken out that way.
  • Concentrated supply is visible before anyone buys: about 82% of $LIBRA sat in a small, unlocked cluster of wallets.
  • Losses are not always recoverable through the courts. An Argentine appeals court ruled the investors had not shown they were deceived, and a US judge released $57.6 million she had frozen.
  • Official inquiries can end before the facts are settled: Argentina's presidential task force was dissolved within three months.
Advertisement

AI agents and automation

Could AI answer your customers from your own documents?

Assistants trained on your files, website and FAQs, with limits on what they can say. Fixed price before any work starts.

AI agents and automation